Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you can find that in lots of instances, wherever one of them is shown the other will be also. Also, you will find there is a reasonably reliable relationship among them with regard to stated loads.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's got a shorter grain sizing, consequently, the designation SC or shorter Reduce. The shorter, far more compact kernels enable the powder to circulation with the powder steps additional easily, helping to ease the consistent chopping of granules.

The truth that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is specifically why you happen to be observing increased velocities acquired with that powder, instead of Everything you've viewed Along with the IMR stuff. Also great powder, but relatively much better suited to slightly lesser instances with a little bit considerably less capability.

I have had several rifles that fouled definitely bad. Acquiring all of the copper out was a true PIA right up until I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.

Yup or it won't do the job properly. And Because the OP features a load using Varget I'd consider to search out another person to trade with. May possibly think of a acquire acquire situation.

Any load data to support that? My initially believed is it's actually not planning to melt away many of the way and velocities will probably be sluggish and everywhere. Is likely to be a nice fireworks Exhibit!

You could have to produce a couple of more posts for getting cleared to perform PM's. After you reach that status I might put up in the classified reloading segment to check out if any individual is in your area to get a trade.

If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you may perhaps look for a load that actually works Alright with the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were above 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the normal fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the biggest bullet that will stabilize, nonetheless it did that wonderfully. It is a humorous-wanting bullet that has a rounded nose profile, but it surely shoots good and kills very well. Deer out to about one hundred fifty yards al went down right away with rib-cage hits.

I could stack em in a single hole but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Right after months, I got lucky and caught some H1000 on the net and of course paid a little bit further. The extremely upcoming week in a gun show a guy experienced a whole scenario of H1000 for $forty per 1lb. I forget about simply how much, but While using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a gentle load.

Why would I point out this? Precisely what is my place? I'm unsure that there's a real valid place other than what on earth is popular with most has not been well known with me in any way in these instances. Do I just Possess a powder jinx or anything? In order to explain to you how mad I actually am, tomorrow I'm range testing a pals new .

Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, they're entirely diverse powders, with IMR 4831 staying significantly h4831sc a lot quicker when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Don't take care of them as the same powder, as they most definitely usually are not.

Of course, You should utilize the exact same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, although the SC Model may help you get somewhat extra in conditions in which you are maxing out situation quantity With all the conventional powder just before achieving pressure boundaries.

I generally generally get the sc Model. Using a powder evaluate it hangs up less resulting from shorter kernels and I believe lets much more reliable metering so much less time you're taking trickling in the final h4831 vs h4831sc bit of cost to make bodyweight. So mainly the SC saves you moments

I found that my 7mag 160 partitions were being sub MOA with 4831sc with very low to min costs. I’m conversing 2700 (probably 2800) fps, it was h4831sc load data a low 60s grain demand in a very Norma scenario. Not what I was looking for, but correct nonetheless.